Rape is Not Terrorism in Pakistan: A Legal Perspective

By

 
Rape is Not Terrorism in Pakistan: A Legal Perspective

A recent judgment by the Sindh High Court in the case of Faqeer Muhammad v. The State (PLD 2024 Sindh 170) has sparked important discussions about the boundaries of terrorism laws in Pakistan. The ruling clarifies that while rape and murder are heinous crimes, they do not automatically fall under the ambit of terrorism as defined in the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (ATA).



The Case at a Glance

The case involved the brutal rape and murder of a six-year-old girl. The prosecution argued that the crime instilled fear in society and, therefore, constituted terrorism. Based on this assertion, the case was initially tried in the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC). However, the accused challenged this jurisdiction, claiming the crime, though grave, did not meet the legal definition of terrorism.

The Court’s Rationale

The Sindh High Court examined the issue by referring to Section 6 of the ATA and precedent set by the Supreme Court in Ghulam Hussain and others v. The State and others (PLD 2020 SC 61). The judgment highlighted two critical elements that distinguish terrorism from other crimes:

  1. Motivation: Terrorism involves acts driven by political, ideological, or religious objectives.

  2. Purpose: The act must aim to destabilize society or create widespread fear beyond the immediate victims and their community.

The court concluded that the crime in question, though heinous, was motivated by personal reasons and lacked the societal destabilization element required to classify it as terrorism. The judgment stated, “Mere gravity or brutal nature of an offense does not provide a valid yardstick for branding the same as terrorism.”

Implications of the Judgment

The ruling underscores that crimes such as rape, despite their horrifying nature, are distinct from acts of terrorism. While they evoke fear and insecurity, these feelings are confined to the immediate community and do not meet the broader societal impact envisioned under the ATA.

By transferring the case to a regular court, the Sindh High Court reinforced the principle that anti-terrorism laws should not be misapplied to cases where the statutory definition of terrorism is not met. This distinction is critical to ensuring that the Anti-Terrorism Courts are not overburdened and that justice is delivered within the appropriate legal framework.

Why This Matters

This judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of preserving the integrity of legal definitions. Misclassifying crimes can dilute the effectiveness of specialized courts and undermine the legislative intent behind anti-terrorism laws. At the same time, it reinforces the need for the judiciary to ensure that heinous crimes like rape and murder are prosecuted with the full force of the law—but under the correct jurisdiction.

Conclusion

The decision in Faqeer Muhammad v. The State reiterates that rape, while a grave and abhorrent crime, is not terrorism under Pakistani law. It is a step towards maintaining clarity in legal proceedings and ensuring that each case is tried within its proper legal framework. This distinction is vital to uphold the principles of justice and the rule of law in Pakistan.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Adoption Law in Pakistan

By
Image
Adoption Law in Pakistan explained in light of Recent Case Law - 2024 YLR 1073 (Writ Petition) There is no specific law regarding the adoption of a child in Pakistan, simply a verbal consent or an adoptions deed is sufficient. Reason being that In Pakistan, adoption is influenced by Islamic teachings, which focus on keeping family lineage intact. This means that the usual Western idea of adoption, where adoptive parents legally replace a child’s biological parents, doesn’t apply here. Instead, Pakistan uses a guardianship approach, where children can be cared for by guardians without changing their family background. This article will be explaining the concept of Adoption, Custody and Guardianship in Pakistan, in light of 2024 YLR 1073 [Lahore (Multan Bench)] where Justice Sadiq Mahmud Khurram very meticulously explained these concepts. Brief facts of the case were that the minor namely Muhammad Ans was put up for adoption and he was adopted by Rasheed Ahmad (respondent No.3) and s...
Read more

Extradition: Chasing Justice Across Borders – From Pablo Escobar’s Escapes to Pakistan’s Legal Game

By
Image
  Extradition: Chasing Justice Across Borders – From Pablo Escobar’s Escapes to Pakistan’s Legal Game   Summary: What do a notorious drug lord, a luxurious prison, and international legal loopholes have in common? The law of extradition . In this post, I explore how criminals like Pablo Escobar managed to escape justice, turning extradition into a high-stakes game of cat and mouse. But what happens when countries—like Pakistan —struggle to bring criminals to justice due to weak extradition laws and political tensions? From Escobar’s daring moves to Pakistan’s modern-day challenges, I break down how extradition works and why it matters more than ever. Intrigued? Let’s dive into the world where crime knows no borders, but neither does justice. What Is Extradition? A Global Game of Tag Extradition is the legal equivalent of a “you can’t hide” card. When someone commits a crime in one country and runs off to another, extradition allows the country they fled to se...
Read more